OSHA Law Blog : Occupational Safety Lawyer & Attorney : Jackson Lewis Law Firm : Health, OSHA Compliance

Now that OSHA's Cranes and Derricks in Construction final rule has been "officially" published in the Federal Register, employers must start the painstaking task of crawling through all of the new requirements and making sure their policies and procedures are fully compliant.  The vast majority of the rule's new requirements take effect on November 8, 2010, so that leaves employers only three months to accomplish this.

To help employers start the process, Jackson Lewis has attached this Special Report, which details the final rule and some of its key requirements.  

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

After issuing a flurry of new enforcement initiatives earlier in the year, such as the Severe Violator Enforcement Program and its memorandum administratively increasing civil penalties, OSHA seems to have shifted its focus a little back toward its regulatory program.  OSHA rulemaking often proceeds at a glacial pace, but in the last few months the Agency has issued two significant rulemaking documents:  a proposed rule to revise standards for housekeeping, walking-working surfaces, and fall protection in general industry, and a final rule updating OSHA's Cranes and Derricks in Construction standards.  The latter document will be published in the Federal Register on August 9.

That is not the end, however.  OSHA's final rule updating recordkeeping requirements to add a separate column for recording musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) is at the Office of Management and Budget for review.  Employers should expect to see it issued in the very near future.    

In OSHA's proposed MSD column rule, published earlier this year, employers would have been required to “check the box” in a separate column on the OSHA 300 log – an “MSD” column – for injuries and illnesses that fit within the Agency’s proposed definition. For purposes of the proposal, the Agency defined MSDs as:

[D]isorders of the muscles, nerves, tendons, ligaments, joints, cartilage and spinal discs. MSDs DO NOT include disorders caused by slips, trips, falls, motor vehicle accidents, or other similar accidents. Examples of MSDs include: Carpal tunnel syndrome, Rotator Cuff syndrome, De Quervain’s disease, Trigger finger, Tarsal tunnel syndrome, Sciatica, Epicondylitis, Tendinitis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, Carpet layers knee, Herniated spinal disc, and Low back pain.

OSHA also proposed to remove existing language from its recordkeeping compliance directive that “minor musculoskeletal discomfort” is not recordable as a restricted work case “if a health care professional determines that the employee is fully able to perform all of his or her routine job functions, and the employer assigns a work restriction for the purpose of preventing a more serious injury.” OSHA stated it was concerned that this language created confusion among employers about recording MSDs. 

OSHA's proposal elicited significant comment from employer and employee groups.  While OSHA may make some changes to its proposal in response to these comments, given the speed with which the Agency is proceeding with the rulemaking, employers should anticipate OSHA finalizing a new MSD column on the OSHA 300 log in some form and making that change effective in the beginning of 2011.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

OSHA's final rule on Cranes and Derricks in Construction has been issued.  Click here to view the document.  As we review the document further, we will provide additional information on the new requirements.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

OSHA has announced that its long-awaited Cranes and Derricks in Construction final rule will be issued on July 28.  OSHA will also be holding a special media briefing on the final rule that same day, featuring OSHA Assistant Secretary David Michaels.  Dr. Michaels will provide an overview of the standard and will answer questions.  We will, of course, provide additional information on the final rule's provisions once it is released.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

OSHA's Cranes and Derricks in Construction final rule has just cleared the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), setting the stage for this important rule to be published within the next few weeks.

As previously discussed in this space, this final rule has been several years in the making.  The proposal contained over 40 separate sections of detailed requirements in such areas as crane assembly, crane operation, inspections, and operator training and certification.  The most controversial provision in the proposed rule related to “Operator Qualification and Certification.” OSHA proposed that all crane operators be certified to operate a crane, principally by having the operators trained and tested by an “accredited” crane operator testing organization.  This provision alone was estimated by OSHA to cost employers $37.3 million.

Construction employers who use cranes in their operations must be prepared to implement the requirements in the final rule.  Once published, we will provide additional information on the final rule's provisions.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

OSHA's Cranes and Derricks in Construction final rule is currently under review at the Office of Management and Budget.  The rule was received by OMB on April 9, 2010, which means that OSHA could publish the rule by the end of July.  Construction employers who use cranes in their operations must prepare for what is sure to be a significant overhaul of OSHA's rules for crane operations.

This final rule has been several years in the making.  It was developed by the Agency through negotiated rulemaking, whereby representatives of employers and organized labor work together with OSHA to develop a draft rule. Consensus was reached by the negotiated rulemaking committee in 2004 and the Agency has been preparing the rule ever since.

The proposal contained over 40 separate sections of detailed requirements in such areas as crane assembly, crane operation, inspections, and operator training and certification.  The most controversial provision in the proposed rule related to “Operator Qualification and Certification.” OSHA proposed that all crane operators be certified to operate a crane, principally by having the operators trained and tested by an “accredited” crane operator testing organization.  This provision alone was estimated by OSHA to cost employers $37.3 million.

Other key requirements proposed by the Agency included:

• General contractors at construction worksites would be required to ensure that the ground at a worksite is firm, drained, and graded so that cranes used will have adequate support.
• Employers operating cranes within 20 feet of power lines would be required to choose from a menu of different options to ensure the cranes do not strike energized lines, possibly injuring or killing employees. 
• Employers would need to inspect cranes before every shift, once a month, and at least once a year.
• All signal persons used in crane operations would need to be certified by a “qualified” evaluator, which the proposal defined as a person who has demonstrated that he or she is competent in accurately assessing whether the signal person understands the types of signals to be used, application of the signals, and crane operation and limitations, among other things.

While OSHA will allow employers time to come into compliance with the new requirements, construction employers should immediately review the final rule once it is published and start to make any necessary changes to their crane operations.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In mid-December 2009, Professor David Michaels was sworn in as the new Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA.  Shortly after being sworn in as Assistant Secretary, Professor Michaels gave an interesting speech at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Going Green Workshop.  The speech was entitled “Making Green Jobs Safe: Integrating Occupational Safety and Health into Green and Sustainability,” and provides a good glimpse as to where he would like to take OSHA in 2010 and beyond.

Professor Michaels’ speech touched on many important issues with respect to occupational safety and health.  In particular, he emphasized the need for workers to be heavily involved in workplace safety, to know the hazards they may face, and to work with their employers to identify and correct hazards in the workplace.  “To get us up to date and move into a safer, healthier future, it’s . . . clear that workers must have a stronger voice in workplace safety than they have now.”  Professor Michaels has always been a strong proponent of safety and health management systems, whereby employers and employees deal proactively with workplace hazards through management leadership, employee participation, hazard identification and control, and system evaluation.  His speech certainly suggests that he will continue to push this as head of OSHA.

Professor Michaels also mentioned OSHA’s “substantial” budget increase, which will “significantly increase the number of inspectors” OSHA puts in the field and the need to update many of OSHA’s outdated standards.  Translation:  the Agency must do everything it can to increase enforcement and engage in smart rulemaking to “to create good standards.”

So what does all this boil down to as a practical matter?  In 2010, employers should expect OSHA to continue to push forward aggressively on enforcement and regulatory initiatives.  Some specific initiatives to watch out for include a:

Final Cranes and Derricks in Construction rule. OSHA staff have been working diligently to finalize a rule addressing hazards associated with crane operations.  If the rule is finalized as proposed, it would be one of the largest overhauls of the nation’s safety regulations in the Agency’s history.  OSHA’s existing rules for cranes in construction take up only a few pages of the Code of Federal Regulations with several cross-references to outdated national consensus standards.  The proposed rule and preamble, in contrast, fill out 250 densely packed pages of the Federal Register.  The proposal contains over 40 separate sections of detailed requirements in such areas as crane assembly, crane operation, inspections, and operator training and certification.

Crystalline Silica Proposed Rule.  Crystalline silica is ubiquitous, comprising a substantial percentage of the Earth’s crust.  OSHA has evidence that exposure to crystalline silica at the current permissible exposure limit (PEL) causes silicosis and lung cancer.  It has been seeking to comprehensively regulate the substance – and reduce the PEL – for over a decade and the Agency seems poised to take that next step in 2010.  Expect a proposed rule on silica to be released sometime this year, as OSHA pushes forward on this longstanding initiative.

New Approach on Ergonomics.  For the last year, various administration officials have stressed the importance of OSHA dealing with WMSDs and ergonomics.  WMSDs still comprise a significant percentage of workplace injuries every year.  WMSDs occur in every industry and in every job throughout the country.

Almost a decade ago, the Clinton Administration finalized an ergonomics standard that would have required all general industry employers to implement an ergonomics program, including the elements of management commitment, employee participation, hazard assessment and control, and medical management.  It also would have mandated “work restriction protection,” which would have required that certain pay and benefits for employees be maintained for periods of time they are out of work due to a work-related injury.

Congress and President Bush disapproved of the final standard, however, and in 2001 it was rescinded under the Congressional Review Act (CRA).  As a result, OSHA is prohibited from promulgating an ergonomics standard that is “substantially the same” as the rescinded standard.  No one knows precisely what those words mean, but they are sure to be hotly debated over the next several months.

OSHA cannot keep avoiding the issue of ergonomics and likely will start to take on the issue in 2010 of what it can and cannot do under the CRA.  It will also likely increase ergonomics enforcement under the General Duty Clause.
 

No matter what happens in 2010, we will keep you up-to-date in this space on the latest OSHA developments.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

In 2009, OSHA emerged from the regulatory and enforcement shell that had shrouded it during the eight years of the Bush Administration. Once confirmed, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis announced that a “new Sheriff” was in town, who would refocus the Department of Labor – including OSHA – on tough enforcement and aggressive rulemaking. In both areas, OSHA delivered on Secretary Solis’s promise.

            OSHA Increases Enforcement

Many critics of OSHA during the Bush Administration focused on the seeming “emphasis” on cooperative programs and compliance assistance, at the expense of strong enforcement. In response, the Department of Labor announced in 2009 the hiring of hundreds of additional compliance officers (CSHOs) to refocus the Agency on what many believe is its core mission – enforcing occupational safety and health standards. It also initiated or revamped several new National Emphasis Programs (NEPs) to further focus CSHOs on certain safety and health issues and hazards:

Chemical Facilities National Emphasis Program. OSHA initiated a new NEP to focus enforcement resources on process safety management (PSM) hazards in chemical facilities across the country. The NEP, effective July 27, 2009, is billed as a “new approach for inspecting PSM covered facilities” and “allows for a greater number of inspections by better allocation of OSHA’s resources.”  In its instructions to compliance officers regarding the scope of inspections, OSHA emphasizes implementation of the PSM standard over documentation. Paper programs are not enough and OSHA will make sure that employers are fully implementing their PSM programs.

Recordkeeping National Emphasis Program. In the fall of 2009, OSHA launched its long-awaited Recordkeeping NEP. The NEP subjects employers in certain industries to comprehensive injury and illness records reviews. The purpose of the NEP is to ascertain whether, and to what extent, employers are under-recording injuries and illnesses at the worksite. OSHA cites several recent studies in the NEP asserting under-recording by employers on OSHA 300 logs. The NEP is designed to “identify and correct under-recorded and incorrectly recorded cases.” Employers subjected to an NEP inspection will face what are likely to be the most comprehensive inspections in the history of the Agency, with detailed records reviews, interviews of numerous employees, and an analysis of employer safety incentive programs and the effect of these programs on the reporting of injuries and illnesses.

Facilities that Manufacture Food Flavorings Containing Diacetyl National Emphasis Program. After focusing for years on the hazards of occupational exposure to diacetyl in microwave popcorn production, OSHA finally shifted its focus with respect to diacetyl to employers who manufacture food flavorings containing diacetyl. OSHA cites a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study finding seven cases of bronchiolitis obliterans – a lung disease associated with exposure to diacetyl – in employees working in facilities where flavorings are manufactured. As part of the NEP, OSHA identifies eighty three facilities for inspection and provides detailed guidance for compliance officers to determine the extent to which these facilities are in overall compliance with their obligations.

Perhaps the most eagerly anticipated – and discussed – enforcement initiative was not an NEP at all, but was related to OSHA enforcement procedures for high to very high occupational exposure to the 2009 H1N1 virus. H1N1 captivated the world this past year, and OSHA spent significant resources addressing the occupational safety and health side of the issue. In the spring and summer of 2009, OSHA responded to the H1N1 outbreak by reissuing and repackaging guidance documents on pandemic influenza that had been previously developed. In November, however, OSHA went further and announced inspection procedures for certain high-hazard H1N1 workplaces, including hospitals, emergency medical centers, doctors’ and dental offices and clinics.

A More Active Regulatory Agenda

In 2009, OSHA also set a course for more activity in the rulemaking arena. As with enforcement, many stakeholders were critical of the Bush Administration’s perceived lack of investment in OSHA’s regulatory agenda. The two most significant regulatory accomplishments during the Bush Administration were the final Hexavalent Chromium rule and the final Employer Payment for PPE rule. Many stakeholders, however, argued that even these accomplishments were essentially forced on the Agency by the federal courts. Whether this is true or not, the first year of the Obama Administration saw the announcement of several new regulatory initiatives and what is even more stunning is that these initiatives were announced without a permanent political head of the Agency.

In 2009, OSHA announced new rulemakings for combustible dust hazards and airborne infectious diseases. OSHA also announced that it would revisit in a new rulemaking the definition of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and how WMSDs should be recorded on OSHA 300 logs. This year OSHA also published its proposed rule to update its hazard communication standard. The hazard communication proposal is one of the most significant OSHA rulemakings in over a decade. OSHA is proposing to revise its hazard communication standard to align it with the United Nations’ Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). If finalized, the rule would affect over 5 million business establishments across the country and potentially over 120 million employees. Over 40 million employees would need to be trained on hazard communication under the proposal. OSHA estimates the annualized compliance costs will be almost $100 million for employers. Annualized benefits are estimated to be approximately $850 million.

Finally, in 2009 OSHA made significant progress on its Cranes and Derricks in Construction proposed rule. OSHA’s proposal was over five years in the making. It was developed by the Agency through negotiated rulemaking, whereby representatives of employers and organized labor work together with OSHA to develop a draft rule. Consensus was reached by the negotiated rulemaking committee in 2004. OSHA held public hearings on the proposed rule in 2009 and Agency staff have been busy reviewing comments received with the goal of issuing a final rule in 2010.

All of this in just over 11 months. And yet, this is likely just the beginning for OSHA as 2010 is expected to bring greater enforcement and regulation. 

(More to come on what to expect in 2010 in the next blog post.)

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link